Home | Publish your case | Other publications
Commercial Products | Consumer Products | Drugs | Industrial Products & Equipment Medical Products & Equipment | Recreational Products | Transportation
Connecticut recognizes independent tort of intentional spoliation of evidence
back to top
Comparative fault principles apply to participants in production chain of allegedly defective product
Plaintiff raised fact question as to whether manufacturer failed to adequately warn of drugs long-term use risk
Common law claims alleging injuries from diabetes drug Rezulin are not preempted
Federal jurisdiction lacking where manufacturer failed to prove federal officer provision applied
Failure to recall defendants name, product did not shift burden to plaintiff to show causation fact question
Inadequate instructions warning against placing foot pedal underneath lift table on scissors lift
Negligent exposure of worker to asbestos
Plaintiff raised fact questions regarding whether nerve lesioning device was unreasonably dangerous
Sophisticated user doctrine applies in case against bungee cord manufacturer
Negligent distribution, sale of defective ski
Pickup trucks seat belt fails to unlatch during rollover
Defective cruise control system in SUV
Defective design using unrecessed toggle power window switch in SUV
Dangerous location of fuel tank outside pickup trucks frame rails
Insufficient roof strength, occupant restraint system in SUV
Plaintiffs may rely on circumstantial evidence in case alleging defective design of cruise control system
Lack of nylon cap on SUVs tires
Defective design where pickup trucks roof lacks B-pillar
Send comments to law.reporter@justice.org
American Association for Justice Contact Us | © 2008 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use | Privacy Statement