ATLA Logo Member Resources


Products Liability Law Reporter

search  



Home | Publish your case | Other publications

Volume 26, No. 9
November 2007

Court Documents

Documents can be downloaded from the Exchange. For security reasons, the AAJ Exchange and its products are available only to AAJ Regular, Life, Sustaining, and President’s Club members.

Documents $50

  • Good v. Altriagroup, Inc. (plaintiffs’ appellate brief in a case holding federal law does not preempt state law claims alleging a tobacco company’s use of phrases such as “light” and “lowered tar and nicotine” were misrepresentations under Maine’s unfair trade law). No. PL1098.

  • Moore v. TRW Vehicle Safety Sys., Inc. (an exhibit in a seat belt spoolout case with correspondence between Ford and seat belt manufacturer TRW in which TRW summarizes rollover and occupant protection data and suggests ways for improving restraint performance). No. PL1099.

Document Sets $95

  • Egbert v. Nissan N. Am., Inc. (the parties’ appellate and reply briefs in a case holding that a presumption of nondefectiveness applies where a product complies with safety standards but that the presumption may be rebutted with a preponderance of the evidence). No. PL1100.

  • Petersen v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. (various documents in a case holding that plaintiffs’ discovery requests to a tire manufacturer were not excessively broad, including defendant’s motion for protection from excessive scope of discovery and supporting memorandum, objections to the magistrate judge’s ruling, and memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs’ motion to compel; plaintiffs’ opposition to defendant’s objections, motion to compel discovery and supporting memorandum, and response and memorandum in opposition to defendant’s motion for protection; defendant’s reply; various exhibits supporting the motions; and the court’s order compelling discovery). No. PL1101.

  • Tinney v. Fitness Experience, Inc. (two of plaintiff’s expert reports in a case against the manufacturer of an inversion exercise table alleging defective design of the ankle-locking device). No. PL1102.

Send comments to law.reporter@justice.org

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice
Contact Us  |  © 2008 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement