| Home | Publish
your case | Other publications

Volume 26, No. 9
November 2007
Court Documents
Documents can be downloaded from the Exchange.
For security reasons, the AAJ Exchange and its products
are available only to AAJ Regular, Life, Sustaining,
and Presidents Club members.
Documents $50
Document Sets $95
-
Egbert v. Nissan N.
Am., Inc. (the parties’ appellate and
reply briefs in a case holding that a presumption
of nondefectiveness applies where a product complies
with safety standards but that the presumption may
be rebutted with a preponderance of the evidence).
No. PL1100.
-
Petersen v. DaimlerChrysler
Corp. (various documents in a case holding that
plaintiffs’ discovery requests to a tire manufacturer
were not excessively broad, including defendant’s
motion for protection from excessive scope of discovery
and supporting memorandum, objections to the magistrate
judge’s ruling, and memorandum in opposition
to plaintiffs’ motion to compel; plaintiffs’
opposition to defendant’s objections, motion
to compel discovery and supporting memorandum, and
response and memorandum in opposition to defendant’s
motion for protection; defendant’s reply;
various exhibits supporting the motions; and the
court’s order compelling discovery). No. PL1101.
- Tinney v. Fitness Experience,
Inc. (two of plaintiff’s expert reports
in a case against the manufacturer of an inversion
exercise table alleging defective design of the ankle-locking
device). No. PL1102.
|