2005

Volume 24, No. 6
July

• Failure to prove plaintiffs fraudulently joined nondiverse defendants warrants remand

Volume 24, No. 5
June

• Riding lawn mower lacked no-mow-in-reverse device

Volume 24, No. 4
May

• Electrical engineering expert was qualified to testify as to whether breakfast pastry caused toaster fire

• Clothes dryer design allows lint to ignite and cause fire

• Plaintiff could amend complaint to add negligent misrepresentation claim

Volume 24, No. 3
April

• Plaintiffs’ expert permissibly relied on process of “reasoning to the best inference”

• Engineer’s affidavit based on circumstantial evidence and reasonable inference established prima facie case