Law Reporter | Products Liability Law Reporter | Professional Negligence Law Reporter
Publish your case | Other publications

Court Documents by Topic

Dog Attacks

Documents can be downloaded from the Exchange. For security reasons, the AAJ Exchange and its products are available only to AAJ Regular, Life, Sustaining, and President’s Club members.

Documents $50

• Davis v. Norman, 48 ATLA L. Rep. 234 (Sept. 2005) (the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law in a case alleging strict liability where a pit bull attacked a man). No. LR4149.

• Pippin v. Fink, 45 ATLA L. Rep. 222 (Aug. 2002) (plaintiffs’ appellate brief in a case in which the court held that the domestic partner of a dog’s registered owner can be held liable under New Jersey’s dog bite statute for injuries the dog caused). No. LR3862.

Document Sets $95

• Bohan v. Ritzo, 39 ATLA L. Rep. 406 (Dec. 1996) (the parties’ appellate briefs in a case holding that a dog owner was strictly liable for injuries that were caused by the dog’s vicious or mischievous acts, despite absence of physical contact). No. LR2885.

• Casares v. Rosalina Gobert Hom Trust, 40 ATLA L. Rep. 141 (May 1997) (plaintiff’s and defendant’s summary judgment memoranda in a case alleging failure to control a dog). No. LR2974.

• Fleming v. Intl. Polar Expeditions, Inc., 37 ATLA L. Rep. 350 (Nov. 1994) (plaintiffs’ complaint and summary judgment motion and the parties’ briefs on the motion in a case alleging failure to adequately confine a dog). No. LR2205.

• Matthews v. Amberwood Assocs. Ltd. Partn., Inc., 42 ATLA L. Rep. 23 (Feb. 1999) (the parties’ appellate briefs in a case holding a landlord owed a duty to a guest killed by a tenant’s pit bull). No. LR3352.

• Reutter v. Reutter, 40 ATLA L. Rep. 221 (Aug. 1997) (complaint and answer and plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and supporting memorandum in a case alleging strict liability where a dog attacked a child). No. LR3033.

• Roland v. LeBlanc, 39 ATLA L. Rep. 409 (Dec. 1996) (plaintiff’s complaint and the parties’ briefs on defendants’ summary judgment motion in a case alleging that a dog constituted a dangerous condition at an apartment building). No. LR2901.

• Smith v. Acierno, 37 ATLA L. Rep. 104 (Apr. 1994) (plaintiff’s response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiff’s proposed jury instruction on negligence, and the court’s ruling on defendants’ posttrial motions in a case alleging that a landlord and apartment complex owners failed to control a tenant’s dog). No. LR1999.