TRIAL
ATLA Logo Member Resources


TRIAL

search  



 

 

 

 

 

 

Motivating jurors

March 2008 | Volume 44, Issue 3

Reach jurors across the generations
R. Rex Parris and James Wren

Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y . . . These aren’t just media-driven labels; people in different generational cohorts express real differences in attitude toward many things. So how do you appeal to a mixed-age group of jurors? By using—of all things—the same research used to sell pickles to the American public.

Reframing the model
David Wenner and Gregory S. Cusimano

The Jury Bias Model is a powerful tool for uncovering jurors’ unspoken hostility toward plaintiffs. But you may not be getting the most from it. Use it in case preparation as well as during trial, and you can turn its traditionally negative focus on tort “reform” messages into a positive approach to strengthening your case.

Tools to keep jurors engaged
Susan J. Macpherson and Elissa Krauss

Juries in many jurisdictions are expected to learn large amounts of complex material in a short amount of time—and to do so without taking notes or asking questions. But in some courts, that’s changing, and jurors are now being given tools to help them absorb and appraise what they hear in a trial.

Making preponderance work
David Ball

Preponderance is one of the key concepts jurors have to grasp. So how do you explain it without annoying or confusing them? The answer: early and often. Use plain language and bring it up during each phase of the trial. Preponderance will work for you—if you work it the right way.

The jury, alive and well
Interview with Neil Vidmar and Valerie Hans

Law professors Neil Vidmar and Valerie Hans have spent decades studying jurors—how they think, how they work, and what they do. Their new book sums it up: American juries are committed and engaged and can understand complex cases if they’re presented clearly.

Toward a better voir dire process
Gregory E. Mize and Paula Hannaford-Agor

In 2005, the ABA’s Principles for Juries and Jury Trials proposed a sound system for jury selection. Last year, the National Center for State Courts released a major study looking at what actually happens with juries in courtrooms. How does reality measure up to the ABA’s ideals? The authors challenge judges and lawyers to set aside competing agendas and work together to build a better voir dire.

Feature

The uncertain future of Medicare set-asides
William L. Winslow

For years, the government did little to enforce the Medicare Secondary Payer Act. But with Medicare looking for ways to stop its money losses, the government has ratcheted up pressure on workers’ comp attorneys—often resulting in overcompliance. Personal injury cases are next, but plaintiff lawyers needn’t fear. There’s helpful case law on the books, and carefully drafted settlement agreements can protect your client’s interests.

News & Trends

Lawsuits challenge use of "chemical restraints" in nursing homes

Stand-alone punitive award in Title VII case cleared by Fifth Circuit

Oklahoma high court approves videotaping of defense medical exams

Massachusetts doctors liable to third parties for failure to warn patients

Free drug samples fail as a safety net for poor patients, study says

Arizona high court upholds several-only liability in products cases

Departments

President’s page
Growing forward

Supreme Court review
Closing the courthouse doors to civil rights plaintiffs

Hearsay

Justice in motion

AAJ debunks drug-maker study and shares real doctor numbers

Upcoming elections may change state courts' ideological balance

Ohio Supreme Court defers to legislature, upholds caps

Experts & Professional Services

Classifieds

Lawyer Networking

Products & Services

Frequently Asked Questions about TRIAL | Past Issues of TRIAL

Send your comments and questions about the online version of TRIAL to us at trial@justice.org

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice • The Leonard M. Ring Law Center
Contact Us  |  © 2006 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement