Jump to:Page Content
The owner of the gun, which discharged when it fell from its holster and struck the floor, claimed that an internal device was defective because it failed to prevent the firing pin from striking the bullet when the gun was subjected to a sharp impact, such as from a fall. Maroney v. Taurus Intl. Mfg., Inc.
The Products Liability Law Reporter is endowed by Perry & Haas, L.L.P., and Robb & Robb, LLC
The endowers have no control over the placement of information or the editorial content of the Products Liability Law Reporter.