Jump to:Page Content
The worker’s estate and parents alleged that the lift was defectively designed in that the outriggers could be removed while the lift was extended. The plaintiffs contended there were safer alternative designs. The jury awarded just under $1.31 million. Matak v. Genie Indus., Inc.
The Products Liability Law Reporter is endowed by Perry & Haas, L.L.P., and Robb & Robb, LLC
The endowers have no control over the placement of information or the editorial content of the Products Liability Law Reporter.