Filed in November 2011 with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), on behalf of women who claim to have suffered injuries after being implanted with vaginal mesh products for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, the plaintiffs asked for the JPML to create separate multidistrict litigation (MDL) cases against three different transvaginal mesh manufacturers.
Martin D. Crump, MS
Mentor ObTape Vaginal Sling: Background on the Product
Derek H. Potts, MO
Mentor ObTape Vaginal Sling: Substantive Issues in Case Selection
C. Calvin Warriner, GA
• JMPL hearing
• State court venues
Henry G. Garrard, III, GA
Transvaginal Mesh (TVM) Litigation Update
Theodore Oshman, NY
Question and Answer Session
Contribute to the AAJ Education Fund
Please consider a donation to the AAJ Education Fund 501(c)(3). Contributions support educational programs and activities to preserve and protect the civil justice system.
Learn more »