ATLA Logo Protecting Your Rights


News and Archives

search  





Judge Rules Mandatory Arbitration Clause Cannot Be Enforced

Myers v. MBNA America and North American Capitol Corporation

[Posted May 3, 2001]

On March 20, 2001, the United States District Court for the District of Montana, in striking down defendant MBNA's motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration, held that the mandatory arbitration amendment to a customer's credit card agreement cannot be enforced, nor can any such agreement to arbitrate be implied from the company-customer relationship.

Beginning in 1997, plaintiff Vera Myers held two cards from MBNA. Shortly after January 23, 1999, Myers received an account statement from MBNA and contacted them to contest certain charges. Myers requested that MBNA close the account, which it did. At some point during this company-customer relationship, MBNA issued an amendment to its customer agreement, stating that any claim or dispute is to be resolved by binding arbitration. This "Arbitration Section" became effective February 1, 2000.

Myers argued that the arbitration clause was unenforceable under Montana law because she never agreed under the contractual relationship between the parties to arbitrate her dispute with MBNA. MBNA argued that the clause is enforceable and valid as an amendment that Myers agreed to allow when she accepted a card and credit line from MBNA in 1997.

In striking down MBNA's motion to compel arbitration, Chief Judge Donald W. Molloy found that the Arbitration Section cannot be enforced, and that no such agreement to arbitrate could be implied. Observing that MBNA's proposal of the Arbitration Section as a change in the terms of the parties' relationship that would be effective unless rejected by the cardholder, Chief Judge Molloy declared that, in affect, "MBNA skipped offer and went straight to acceptance."

"If MBNA's argument that Myers agreed' to arbitration ... there would be no reason to stop at arbitration," Molly added. "MBNA could amend' the Agreement to include a provision taking a security interest in Myers' home or requiring Myers to pay a penalty if she failed to convince three friends to sign up for MBNA cards."

Myers v. MBNA America and North American Capitol Corporation, CV 00-163-M-DWM (D.Mont., March 20, 2001) is not yet available online.

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice • The Leonard M. Ring Law Center
Contact Us  |  © 2006 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement