Law Reporter | Products Liability Law Reporter | Professional Negligence Law Reporter
Publish your case | Other publications

Court Documents by Topic

Mandatory Arbitration

Documents can be downloaded from the Exchange. For security reasons, the AAJ Exchange and its products are available only to AAJ Regular, Life, Sustaining, and President’s Club members.

Documents $50

• Ackerman v. Money Store, 42 ATLA L. Rep. 177 (June 1999) (unpublished opinion in a case holding that an employer violated New Jersey’s antidiscrimination law by interfering with the plaintiff’s right to a trial by jury when it terminated her employment for refusing to sign an arbitration agreement). No. LR3431.

• Broughton v. Cigna Healthplans of Cal., 43 ATLA L. Rep 131 (May 2000) (AAJ’s amicus curiae brief in a case holding that a claim for injunctive relief under state consumer law may not be subject to arbitration). No. LR3551.

• Grundstad v. Ritt, 40 ATLA L. Rep. 133 (May 1997) (plaintiff’s appellate brief in a case in which the court held that a guarantor could not be compelled to arbitrate his liability under an arbitration clause in the underlying contract even though his agreement was in the same document). No. LR2977.

• Majdi v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 43 ATLA L. Rep 176 (June 2000) (plaintiff’s complaint in a case alleging wrongful termination and racial discrimination where a store required applicants to sign an arbitration agreement to be considered for employment). No. LR3572.

• Wilson v. Waverlee Homes, Inc., 40 ATLA L. Rep. 134 (May 1997) (plaintiffs’ brief opposing the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration in a case in which the court held that a binding arbitration clause in installment sales and financing contracts conflicted with the Magnuson-Moss Act). No. LR2989.

Document Sets $95

• Badie v. Bank of Am., 42 ATLA L. Rep. 339 (June 1999) (summary judgment briefs and motions, the parties’ trial and posttrial briefs, the court’s decision and judgment, the parties’ appellate briefs, and the court’s opinion in a case holding that a mandatory arbitration clause is an unenforceable modification to a contract if it was not within the reasonable contemplation of the parties when they entered into the original contract). No. LR3369.

• Cardegna v. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc., 48 ATLA L. Rep. 82 (Apr. 2005) (plaintiffs’ opening and reply briefs to the Florida Supreme Court in this case holding that where a borrower claims a contract is void, arbitration cannot be compelled until the court determines the contract’s legality). No. LR4109.

• Cheng-Canindin v. Renaissance Hotel Assocs., 40 ATLA L. Rep 54, 74 (Mar. 1997) (the parties’ appellate briefs in a case in which the court held a hotel employee handbook’s dispute resolution procedures did not amount to an arbitration agreement, and the hotel could not compel arbitration of a wrongful termination claim). No. LR2934.

• Crawford v. Cavalier Mfg., 42 ATLA L. Rep. 339 (Nov. 1999) (plaintiff’s complaint, the defendants’ brief in support of a motion to compel arbitration, and the plaintiff’s supplemental response to that motion in a case in which the court held that an arbitration clause in a manufactured-home sales contract and financing documents was invalid). No. LR3507.

• Lambdin v. Dist. Ct., 39 ATLA L. Rep. 197 (June 1996) (the parties’ motions and briefs in a case holding that an employment agreement’s arbitration provision was void under the Colorado Wage Claim Act, which prohibits waiver of rights). No. LR2730.

• Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Lai, 38 ATLA L. Rep. 99 (Apr. 1995) (the parties’ appellate briefs and amici curiae briefs in a case holding that a Title VII plaintiff will be forced to arbitrate only if he or she knowingly agreed to do so). No. LR2359.