TRIAL
ATLA Logo Member Resources


TRIAL

search  



Protecting workers

March 2003 | Volume 39, Issue 3

Third-party liability for workplace injuries
Martin K. Brigham and Daniel Bencivenga

For those with catastrophic injuries, the workers' compensation system is not an adequate financial safety net. State laws prohibit injured workers from suing their employers, but lawsuits against others who played a role in their injuries—including product manufacturers and contract employers—may provide a route to an appropriate financial recovery.

Fighting arbitration's abuse of power
Michael J. Quirk and Kerry-Ann T. Powell

The Supreme Court's decision in Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, holding that the Federal Arbitration Act covers most employment contracts, has encouraged employers to make workers' waiver of their constitutional right to a jury trial a condition of hiring or continued employment. But advocates can still use state and federal laws to battle arbitration abuses and preserve employees' rights.

A new framework for sexual harassment cases
Louise F. Fitzgerald

A fixture of sexual harassment suits, the psychological examination of the plaintiff often retraumatizes her and may harm her case. Attorneys can forgo traditional forensic exams in favor of expert testimony on social science research that shows how harassment affects victims' mental and emotional health.

Righting wrongs against immigrant workers
Eric Schnapper

Are legal remedies available to undocumented workers whose rights are violated? The Supreme Court's recent decision in Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB may lead to an answer

Features

General aviation crash course: the first 15 days
Jack W. London

Federal rules bar you from participating in a formal plane crash investigation, but you can still obtain government reports and interview witnesses. A good plan will help you and your clients make informed decisions early in the case.

Brain trauma and the myth of the resilient child
John D. Briner

The conventional wisdom has long held that an infant who sustains a brain injury stands a better chance of recovery than someone injured at a later age. This principle has now been disproved, and litigators must take a new approach to quantifying damages.

News & Trends

Lawsuits over antidepressants claim the drug is worse than the disease

Supreme Court broadens plaintiff access to traffic data

Real-estate agency owners win liability protection in Supreme Court

Ohio high court creates cancer research fund from punitive damages award

Consumer amends binding arbitration provision; court holds change valid

Nursing home cases are distinct from medical negligence claims, Florida high court rules

ABA's proposed lawyer definition runs afoul of FTC, Justice Department

GM documents sway jury for plaintiff in Missourisudden-acceleration case

State emotional-distress claim bolsters family-leave suit

Cosmetics company loses face in discrimination claim

Departments

President's page
Fighting back for injured patients

Washington focus
Forgotten faces

Letters

Supreme Court review
The Supreme Court's blockbuster term

Quotes

Books

Legally Speaking: 40 Powerful Presentation Principles Lawyers Need to Know
by Daniel Dempsey

Reversible Errors
by Scott Turow

Smoke-Filled Rooms
W. Kip Viscusi

Classifieds

Classifieds

Frequently Asked Questions about TRIAL | Past Issues of TRIAL

Send your comments and questions about the online version of TRIAL to us at trial@justice.org

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice • The Leonard M. Ring Law Center
Contact Us  |  © 2006 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement