TRIAL
ATLA Logo Member Resources


TRIAL

search  



Law office management and technology

January 2004 | Volume 40, Issue 1

Keep a mass tort from becoming mass confusion
Andy D. Birchfield Jr. and W. Chadwick Cook

The mountain of documents compiled in a case involving only one plaintiff can overwhelm even the most organized attorney. Multiply that by hundreds or even thousands of plaintiffs in a mass tort, and you’re teetering toward chaos. If you organize documents into an electronic database, you can store, access, and search them easily—and maintain control of your most complex cases.

Internet research for bookworms
Linda Friedman

Gone are the days when lawyers clocked long hours at law libraries, poring over code volumes and case reporters and feeding coins into copy machines to obtain necessary documents. Web-based research helps you find the makings of a strong case—statutes, case law, briefs, articles, court documents, colleagues who have handled similar cases—all without leaving the office.

The state of electronic court filing
Susan Larson

The good news is that courts are making the move to e-filing. The bad news? Many have done so without consulting lawyers about how to make electronic filing systems work most efficiently. Learn the features of existing systems and how to help shape the future of e-filing in the courts.

Using PDF files for case and practice management
Sharon Traylor Russell

Portable document format—or PDF—creates an electronic version of a document that looks exactly like the paper version. But this technology isn’t just for reading and printing anymore. With Adobe Acrobat 6.0 software, busy lawyers can also fill in and file forms online, create new PDF documents, search and share them, and even “sign” them with digital signatures.

No strings attached
Ross Kodner

Today’s wireless technology keeps you linked to your network, your e-mail, and the Internet—whether you’re working at your office desk, in an airport, or at home.

Feature

Uncertain seas for maritime punitive damages
John W. deGravelles

A 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision sent maritime plaintiffs seeking punitive damages into dire straits. Fortunately, some courts are interpreting it narrowly, providing smoother sailing for plaintiffs.

A lawyer’s guide to cross-cultural depositions
Nina Ivanichvili

When a witness speaks limited or no English, you’ll need to understand how his or her culture and experience might influence verbal and nonverbal responses to your deposition questions.

News & Trends

Supreme Court wades into ERISA’s ‘Serbonian bog’ again

USDA faces series of discrimination lawsuits

Third Circuit upholds faith-based peremptory challenges

Product disparagement’ suit raises First Amendment questions

Doctor’s duty to warn extends to patients, not third parties

Ninth Circuit expands ‘extreme cruelty’ under domestic abuse law

Merchant’s racial slurs violated customer’s civil rights, N.J. court says

Departments

President’s page
Stop the lies, spread the truth

Supreme Court review
Constitution bars prosecution of long-ago child abusers

Reflections
State courts do the work federal courts can’t—and shouldn’t

Notice of bylaws amendment

Hearsay

Books

Dead Ringer
by Lisa Scottoline

Writing for the Legal Audience
by Wayne Schiess

Classifieds

Classifieds

Frequently Asked Questions about TRIAL | Past Issues of TRIAL

Send your comments and questions about the online version of TRIAL to us at trial@justice.org

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice • The Leonard M. Ring Law Center
Contact Us  |  © 2006 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement