TRIAL
ATLA Logo Member Resources


TRIAL

search  



 

 

 

 

The closing courthouse door

January 2006 | Volume 42, Issue 1

The health courts facade
Joanne Doroshow

Opponents of the civil justice system are touting health courts—basically, arbitration panels for medical malpractice claims—as an efficient alternative to litigation. But the experience of states that have tried health courts shows they’re a failure when it comes to delivering justice and protecting patients.

Waging war through court rules
James E. Rooks Jr.

Neutral court rules—along with the right to trial by jury and an independent judiciary—are among the many “pillars” supporting the civil justice system. Tort “reformers’” proposed amendments to the federal court rules threaten to chip away at their neutrality, weakening the justice system’s entire structure and threatening catastrophic results.

When arbitration subverts democracy
Richard C. Reuben

Mandatory arbitration and the doctrine of separability block injured consumers’ and employees’ access to the courts and undermine the rule of law—a cornerstone of American democracy.

Justice denied

Sometimes, even the strongest case, with the best clients and the best lawyer, can’t prevail against unfair laws or unjustifiably stubborn decision-makers. Three lawyers remember cases when, despite their best efforts, the courthouse door slammed shut on their clients.

Access to justice
Deborah L. Rhode

“Justice for all” is a noble ideal, but it doesn’t reflect the sobering reality of our justice system. Studies show that lower-income and middle-income Americans have limited access to legal representation, especially in criminal cases. The author calls on the government and lawyers to expand their efforts to ensure that “justice for all” is more than an empty slogan.

Features

The shocking truth about electrical products
Carrie R. Frank and Anne M. Rhodes

Most people know the basics of using electricity safely. What they may not know is that many ordinary electrical products don’t have safety features needed to prevent electrocution. When product manufacturers fail to provide basic protections like proper warnings, circuitry, or grounding systems, the result—too often—is deadly.

News & Trends

Supreme Court weighs enforcement of arbitration clause in “payday” loans

“No prior accidents” claim does not prove safety, says Third Circuit

Federal agencies do not report malpractice cases, study shows

N.Y. high court blocks claim of secondhand asbestos exposure

Tasers continue to draw scrutiny

Companies deduct settlement payments from taxes, GAO finds

Delaware high court says First Amendment covers Internet postings

Supreme Court won’t put cell phone cases on hold

Departments

President’s page
Making our message heard

Supreme Court review
A term to remember

Reflections
A call to protect human dignity

Hearsay

ATLA in motion

Constitutional challenge takes aim at gun industry immunity

New projects set high bar for new lawyers

New litigation resources focus on injured-infant cases

Straight talk about vaccines

Update

Books

Interpreting State Constitutions: A Jurisprudence of Function in a Federal System
by James A. Gardner

Experts in Court: Reconciling Law, Science, and Professional Knowledge
by Bruce D. Sales

Classifieds

Lawyer Networking

Products & Services

Frequently Asked Questions about TRIAL | Past Issues of TRIAL

Send your comments and questions about the online version of TRIAL to us at trial@justice.org

Balancing the Scales of Justice
American Association for Justice • The Leonard M. Ring Law Center
Contact Us  |  © 2006 AAJ Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Statement