|
Visit the Press Room for more breaking
news
Contact: Chris Mather
202-965-3500 x369
202-725-5252 (Cell)
New Study Shows Courts Not Clogged With Frivolous Medical Malpractice
Lawsuits
(Thursday, May 11, 2006 -Washington DC) New research
published in the May 11 edition of the New England Journal of Medicine
establishes that almost every medical malpractice suit filed in the
United States has a meritorious basis and rejects claims that the
civil justice system is inundated with frivolous lawsuits.
This study, conducted by the independent and highly-respected
Harvard School of Public Health, shows that efforts to implement a
one-size-fits-all cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice
cases simply are unnecessary and merely a ploy by the insurance industry
to pad their profit margin, said Ken Suggs, president of the
Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA). If anything,
the research establishes that the system is advantageous to big insurance
companies and biased against injured patients.
Those who read the Associated Press account of the study may be a
bit confused. The reporter wrote that 40 percent of all malpractice
claims are groundless, which is in no way substantiated by the study.
The reporter, apparently, combined the 3 percent of claims that didnt
involve injury with the 37 percent in which an injury occurred but
no negligence was found. Theres a world of difference between
the two as other journalistic reports properly noted.
The Harvard study found that most malpractice cases are meritorious,
with 97 percent involving injury. Furthermore, 80 percent of the claims
involving physical injuries resulted in major disability or death.
In fact, the study noted that the incidence of patients seriously
injured as a result of medical negligence who dont receive compensation
is a far larger problem than cases where substantial monetary damages
are awarded where negligence is not present. It also maintains the
civil justice system does a good job of uncovering trivial claims
and having them dismissed.
The research supports the wisdom displayed by the U.S. Senate this
week when it rejected an attempt to apply a $250,000 one-size-fits-all
cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases.
This study disproves once and for all claims made by large
insurance companies that the civil justice system is overrun with
frivolous litigation, Suggs said. The attacks by the insurance
industry represent a ploy to further enrich itself at the publics
expense.
###
As the world's largest trial bar, ATLA
promotes justice and fairness for injured persons, defends the constitutional
right to trial by jury, and strengthens the civil justice system through
education and disclosure of information critical to public health
and safety. With 60,000 members worldwide, ATLA provides lawyers with
the information and professional assistance they need to serve clients
successfully and protect the democratic values of the civil justice
system.
|