Professional Negligence Law Reporter

Medicine

You must be a Professional Negligence Law Reporter subscriber to access this content.

If you are a member of AAJ's Professional Negligence Section or a subscriber, log in below. Not yet a Section member? Join today!

Join the Professional Negligence Section

Improper removal of IUD

May/June 2021

Doe, a 36-year-old veteran, went to a VA medical center to undergo placement of an intrauterine device (IUD). The procedure was performed by a nurse practitioner in training who was overseen by another nurse practitioner. Six days later, Doe experienced sharp pain and cramping in her abdomen. An ultrasound revealed that the IUD had migrated and required removal.

A gynecologist performed surgery to remove the device, and Doe was discharged home. The next day, when she was feeling ill, she went to a private hospital, where she was evaluated and referred back to the VA. There, she was diagnosed as having peritonitis, necessitating surgery that included a tubal ligation. Doe suffers from continuing pain, which affects her during intercourse. Although she considered having additional children, she is now unable to do so.

Doe sued the United States, alleging liability for the gynecologist’s excessive force in removing the IUD, which led to a bowel perforation.

The defense argued that Doe’s injuries were just a complication, not negligence.

The parties settled for $500,000.

Citation: Doe v. United States, Undisclosed Dkt. No. (Confidential Jxn. & Ct. Dec. 21, 2020).

Plaintiff counsel: AAJ members Brewster S. Rawls and Glen H. Sturtevant, both of Richmond, Va.